*The green line outlines the Madrona walk zone and the darker green filled in area is the Leschi walk zone.
Quote from parent Ryan Simmons: To say the the Board is listening and that the parents are happy is DEFINITELY inaccurate.
The attached map demonstrates how the walk zones in the area overlay each other, I have attached a map developed by the community. This map clearly demonstrates that schools nearby each other with overlaying walk zones in less student dense areas have been positioned as neighborhood schools, which drives a much higher demand for busing than a normal neighborhood plan would. This can be corrected by sending at least 400 students to TT Minor, and at last grounding the area in a sustainable stable neighborhood school plan. TT Minor is not a good permanent home for the Seattle World School.
Since then it has been confirmed that almost 500 currently live in the TT Minor walk zone with the number projected to grow to 600 by 2017. All elected officials, not just School Board members, can influence the decision of the Board. Revised recommendations will go to the Board on November 6, and the final vote will be November 20.
The neighborhood was not in any way consulted during the process of developing a new proposal for the use of the TT Minor. Just in case you have questions about how the walk zones in the area overlay each other, I have attached a map developed by the community. This map clearly demonstrates that schools nearby each other with overlaying walk zones in less student dense areas have been positioned as neighborhood schools, which drives a much higher demand for busing than a normal neighborhood plan would. This can be corrected by sending at least 400 students to TT Minor, and at last grounding the area in a sustainable stable neighborhood school plan. TT Minor is not a good permanent home for the Seattle World School.
Given your own guiding principles of of walkable neighborhood schools and the fact that the child/student dense area covered by the TT Minor walk zone between E. Cherry and E. John/Thomas/Madison is not covered in any other walk zones, reopening TT Minor as a neighborhood school should be obvious to you. During the school closures, it was no secret that the neighborhood objected, and much of the neighborhood again requested that they continue to be guaranteed assignment to Stevens until TT Minor was available again. The date that the lease there would be up was never clear. These past actions in themselves, along with the number of students requiring transportation, should have made it clear that TT Minor as neighborhood school was still of great interest to the community, and yet there was no outreach to the community regarding the fact that the building would again be available. Why would the District even consider the perfectly located neighborhood elementary school facility. TT Minor, as a location for a non neighborhood based secondary program? That remains a mystery to all our neighborhood groups.
Neighborhood parents and community members were not in any of the discussions regarding where the Seattle World School would be located. In fact, it was TBD until the last minute before BEX IV went on the ballot. This neighborhood, including myself, support Seattle Schools and the students as much as any other neighborhood and would not want to be against a major BEX Levy.
Our neighborhood students have been sent to many different schools and there is not a PTSA representing this area, and it takes awhile for everyone to realize what is happening and the repercussions of the various proposals. Many of the parents concerned with the action to get TT Minor back as a neighborhood school include parents of preschool children, and this is there first dealings with the Seattle School District. The needs of this neighborhood are now. The children live here. The families deserve a sustainable neighborhood school.
ORGANIZING COMMENTS FROM ONE OF THE ORGANIZERS IS AS FOLLOWS: As Ryan and I found out last round, 2 minutes is an incredibly short amount of time to make an argument. You are really limited to one or two points. We got together the other day and brainstormed some ideas for speaking slots. If we can use these tomorrow, fantastic. Otherwise feel free to use them as email fodder.
(1) This proposal disregards the board’s own guiding principles for our community. There isn’t time to cover them all, but here are some key examples. (This might be a bit long for 2 min–if someone takes this and testifies, try to time yourself beforehand to see if you can get it out.)
–Ground decisions in data: There are 500 elementary age kids within walking distance of TT Minor, and housing starts going up all over the central district and capital hill. Somehow the district still believes it can accommodate all the K-5 need in existing schools, some of which are already bursting at the seams. This is not grounding decisions in accurate data.
–Maximize walkability: TT Minor would provide a safe, walkable school for all the K-5 kids in Areas 42 and 43. Studies have shown that kids who walk or bike to school have higher achievement. Denying walkability to our community when a neighborhood school building exists that suits our needs is discriminatory and contrary to this guiding principle.
–Enable cost-effective transportation: As we have discussed, if TT Minor is not reopened, our entire community will require busing to Lowell, Stevens, McGilvra, Madrona, or whatever school we are assigned to. This is not cost-effective when 500 kids could walk to TT Minor tomorrow.
–Minimize disruptions by aligning new boundaries with old: Our neighborhood has suffered three different elementary school assignments since 2009 and been threatened two more times with changed assignments. This pattern will not stop until TT Minor is reopened as our neighborhood school.
–Be responsive to family input: We are a highly motivated group of parents who have gone to great lengths to provide data, solve complex problems, reach out to other groups, attend meetings, etc. The board is deaf to our concerns. We have been marginalized, our neighborhood divided, all with no explanation as to why our children do not deserve the type of stable, walkable school assignment indicated in SPS guiding principles.
(2) The community engagement process is a failure.
–We have complied with the methods SPS has put forth, as difficult as that has been for working parents. We have spoken at community meetings, emailed the board and Growth Boundaries email, testified at board meetings, and filled out surveys. None of these methods has been successful at getting the board to respond to our concerns.–Further, there is no transparency in how the board makes growth boundary decisions. The maps are released with no explanations or justifications; we are left wondering why lines were drawn in seemingly nonsensical ways. A real engagement process would involve dialogue between community groups and the board and collaboration through focus groups and facilitated meetings to develop a mutually agreeable plan. If decisions are being made in accordance with SPS guiding principles, there is no reason to withhold data. If SPS has something to hide, then they will continue with this closed-door process where constituents go to great effort to speak to impassive, immutable board members and staff.
(3) Closing TT Minor in 2009 was a mistake. Failing to open it now is a bigger mistake. –Parents in our neighborhood have been trying to inform you since 2009 that the need for TT Minor exists and is only growing. We have 500 kids who can walk to this school, but Area 42 and 43 children have been moved repeatedly since 2009. Our neighborhood lies on the fringe of every other school’s boundary, leaving us vulnerable to continually shifting school assignments as other neighborhood schools fill with the predicted enrollment increases.–There is little doubt the GenEd needs of the TT Minor community will require its return as a neighborhood elementary school within 5 years. SPS promised TT Minor to the World School without transparency, without taking into account growth data, without real community input. They too have been jerked around mercilessly by the school district. Putting the World School at TT Minor would be another broken promise, because when it eventually has to revert back to its original use as a neighborhood elementary, the World School will be uprooted again, TT Minor will need to be remodeled again, and school assignments for families will change again. Let’s just avoid this whole cascade of problems and find the World School its own permanent home.
TT Minor neighborhood parents who did attend a BEX planning discussion at Stevens were told that their questions were inappropriate.
This hopefully adds to the conversation.
SDOT recently posted two alternative Greenway proposals to accompany the 23rd Ave. Corridor Project. The alternatives employ either 21st or 22nd Ave in conjunction with sections of 23rd Ave for the proposed bicycle route. These designs will be discussed at the upcoming community meeting November 6th, 5:30pm, at the Nova H.S. auditorium. SDOT’s invitation, from communication director Maribel Cruz, is pasted below.
