The Seattle School District just released their annual school report cards documenting individual school performance and growth ( http://www.seattleschools.org/modules/cms/pages.phtml?pageid).
The Seattle Times editorial board thinks the report cards are “promising,” but the paper hasn’t offered much analysis beyond that ( http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2016792879_).
One exciting finding for the central district is that Leschi Elementary has jumped from a level 1 to level 3 in the segmentation rankings. That’s pretty outstanding! Our other local schools all maintatined their 2009-2010 levels (Madrona K-8: level 1; Stevens: level 4; Baily Gatzert: level 1). A graph of the 2009-2010 levels is attached to this post. The segmentation levels were discussed last year by the Times:
“SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS unveiled a new rating system for its schools Tuesday that measures not just how many students pass state tests, but how much improvement students make from year to year. The schools all were ranked on a scale of 1 to 5, with a 5 meaning that a school had a high percentage of students passing state math and reading tests and students are improving. A 1 means that schools have a low passage rate on state tests and low-medium improvement. Here are the schools at each level”
Leschi is an awesome school.
I could not find the slide you show in either link. Any further info as to where it could be found would be appreciated.
That’s a plot from 2009-2010 that I think was originally compiled by the Times (though I may be wrong there). Hopefully somebody will put together a similar plot for 2010-2011. It’s makes the data a lot easier to grasp. I’m not sure where the Times got the X- and Y-axis information for their plot (Absolute performance Index vs. Growth performance index). It’s not clear to me from looking at the report cards?
You can still access the 2009-2010 plot via the CHS blog archives:
Many Thanks Ryan – the plot is very illuminating!