People who live near electric trolley bus lines can breathe a little easier. Initial findings from a King County Metro study comparing the costs and benefits of replacing the agency’s aging trolley bus fleet lean heavily in favor of staying electric. In fact, a trolley fleet beats out a diesel hybrid fleet in nearly every way, from cost to environmental impact to quality of life.
“Electric trolley buses perform better on steep grades, are quieter, have lower greenhouse gas emissions and consume less energy on a yearly basis,” according to the initial findings report published by King County Metro as part of their Trolley Bus System Evaluation.
The majority of bus routes in the Central District are trolley buses, and CDN and our sister site Capitol Hill Seattle have been watching the replacement debate closely. A not-so scientific online poll conducted by CHS in June showed wide support for trolley buses.
There will be a public meeting April 27, and public comments on the findings are due by May 6. The report will inform Metro’s budget this summer, which will go to the King County Council for approval in November. If all goes smoothly, the new trolley buses could start rolling out in 2014. You can send feedback on the report to Project Manager Christina O’Claire [email protected].
Wednesday, April 27, from 5 to 7 p.m.
Hildebrand Hall at Plymouth Congregational Church (1217 Sixth Ave., Seattle)
Due to Seattle City Light’s heavy use of power sources that emit little CO2, such as hydroelectric, a diesel hybrid replacement would emit nearly 22 times as much CO2 as a trolly bus replacement. Aside from carbon emissions, the trolley buses use less energy in general.
The trolley buses are also more cost-effective, according to the report. Though they cost more per bus than diesel hybrids, their lifespans are estimated to be three years longer than their diesel counterparts (15 years vs 12). After factoring in energy savings and federal grants, the annual operating costs for a trolley system would be several million dollars less. As Central District News pointed out, the operating costs of the diesel fleet are heavily dependent on unpredictable fuel prices.
In a weighing of the pros and cons for each technology, electric trolley buses beat out or tied hybrids in every criteria from noise to air quality to “neighborhood character.” The only criteria in favor of diesel hybrid buses is “visual quality,” due to the removal of overhead trolley wires.
The trolley buses that run on Central District routes #2, #3, #4, and #14 have relatively new bodies that were purchased in 2002. However, in a cost-saving move, the county bought them without motors and simply recycled the 1970s-era propulsion systems from the old trolley buses that they replaced. The other part of the trolley bus fleet is composed of the Breda articulated buses that run on busy routes like the #7 and #43. Those were purchased in the late 80s to run in the downtown bus tunnel, and originally had diesel engines that would run out on the streets and then switch to electric motors once inside the tunnel. But Metro began running new diesel hybrid buses in the tunnel in 2004, and began to switch the old Breda buses to trolley-only routes. The diesel engines were removed and they became electric-only.
Here is the initial findings report:
Glad they did it right — I knew this would be the result as long as they didn’t try to skew the analysis somehow to justify getting rid of the trolleys. I’m sure there’s folks at Metro who think it’s just a big pain to maintain those wires and would love to get rid of that whole system.
I agree it is cool to get good news.
Maybe it’s because I take the 7 to get to work everyday, and the fleet of 7 buses is mainly comprised of old trolleys, but I don’t think that these are very time effective buses. They are much slower, cannot maneuver through traffic as easily, get stuck behind other trolley buses especially along 3rd Avenue downtown, and frequently come off of the wires. Again, this may happen to me a lot because the fleet of 7 buses are a lot older and are in desperate need of replacement, but it happens too much for trolley buses to be deemed the a much better choice.
Any new trolleybuses Metro buys would be far more modern than the current fleet. New models have higher top-speeds, poles that can be raised and lowered automatically from the driver’s seat, as well as onboard battery packs that allow the bus to travel around a mile off-wire.
So yeah, it’s an issue with the old technology.
As I recall, the main cost-savings the original study found in the Diesels was labor costs, as trolleybus drivers have to follow the wire to and from base, rather than taking a more direct route. That conclusion always seemed questionable to me, so I’m glad they left it out of this study.
Wednesday, April 27 · 5:00pm – 7:00pm
Plymouth Congregational Church
1217 6th Ave.
Save Our Electric Trolley Buses!, Jon Morgan
*Note: this event has been rescheduled from the 19th to the 27th.
Good news, everyone! The County’s preliminary report is out and recommends that Metro KEEP OUR TROLLEY BUS NETWORK and order new trolley buses to replace our current ones. ( http://kingcounty.gov/exec/news/release/2011/March/29Trolley)
Please come to this public event to learn more and express your support for clean, quiet, financially sustainable transit.
I’m told Metro will put out a survey on this, but it’s still important that you tell Executive Constantine and your County Council member why you support electric trolley buses. If you don’t know who your County Council person is, or need their contact info, you can use this link ( http://www.kingcounty.gov/council.aspx) and enter your address in the top right corner.
Remember: we don’t just want to barely win and keep our ETB network; we want to win BIG and expand it! Thanks for all your help.